<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Screenshots Emerge of the New Twitter Retweet Feature</title>
	<atom:link href="http://staynalive.com/articles/screenshots-emerge-of-the-new-twitter-retweet-feature/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://staynalive.com/articles/screenshots-emerge-of-the-new-twitter-retweet-feature/</link>
	<description>My View of the Real-Time Web - Tech and Rants From Jesse Stay, The "Social" Geek</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 14:57:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harsh Agrawal</title>
		<link>http://staynalive.com/articles/screenshots-emerge-of-the-new-twitter-retweet-feature/comment-page-1/#comment-14760</link>
		<dc:creator>Harsh Agrawal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 08:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://staynalive.com/?p=3431#comment-14760</guid>
		<description>I find this update worth considering, but seems like my twitter profile is not as lucky as other &lt;br&gt;lucky people who see this new update</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find this update worth considering, but seems like my twitter profile is not as lucky as other <br />lucky people who see this new update</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harsh Agrawal</title>
		<link>http://staynalive.com/articles/screenshots-emerge-of-the-new-twitter-retweet-feature/comment-page-1/#comment-13863</link>
		<dc:creator>Harsh Agrawal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 03:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://staynalive.com/?p=3431#comment-13863</guid>
		<description>I find this update worth considering, but seems like my twitter profile is not as lucky as other &lt;br&gt;lucky people who see this new update</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find this update worth considering, but seems like my twitter profile is not as lucky as other <br />lucky people who see this new update</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John E. Bredehoft (Empoprises)</title>
		<link>http://staynalive.com/articles/screenshots-emerge-of-the-new-twitter-retweet-feature/comment-page-1/#comment-13779</link>
		<dc:creator>John E. Bredehoft (Empoprises)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:55:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://staynalive.com/?p=3431#comment-13779</guid>
		<description>Nick, I&#039;m going to click through to your original blog post in just a moment. Currently when I want to retweet, I switch over to slandr and use its one-button retweet functionality. Once I get the Twitter version, I&#039;ll compare the two and see which one I like better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick, I&#39;m going to click through to your original blog post in just a moment. Currently when I want to retweet, I switch over to slandr and use its one-button retweet functionality. Once I get the Twitter version, I&#39;ll compare the two and see which one I like better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Recurso &#8220;retwitte&#8221; já pode ser usado por poucos - Twitter Brasil</title>
		<link>http://staynalive.com/articles/screenshots-emerge-of-the-new-twitter-retweet-feature/comment-page-1/#comment-13761</link>
		<dc:creator>Recurso &#8220;retwitte&#8221; já pode ser usado por poucos - Twitter Brasil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 10:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://staynalive.com/?p=3431#comment-13761</guid>
		<description>[...] retirada daqui   [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] retirada daqui   [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jessestay</title>
		<link>http://staynalive.com/articles/screenshots-emerge-of-the-new-twitter-retweet-feature/comment-page-1/#comment-13744</link>
		<dc:creator>jessestay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 04:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://staynalive.com/?p=3431#comment-13744</guid>
		<description>No problem Nick - thanks for sharing that with me!  I wanted to make sure&lt;br&gt;you got plenty of credit for being first with those.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No problem Nick &#8211; thanks for sharing that with me!  I wanted to make sure<br />you got plenty of credit for being first with those.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Shin</title>
		<link>http://staynalive.com/articles/screenshots-emerge-of-the-new-twitter-retweet-feature/comment-page-1/#comment-13743</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Shin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 04:36:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://staynalive.com/?p=3431#comment-13743</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the mention Jesse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the mention Jesse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: axisportals</title>
		<link>http://staynalive.com/articles/screenshots-emerge-of-the-new-twitter-retweet-feature/comment-page-1/#comment-13739</link>
		<dc:creator>axisportals</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 04:01:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://staynalive.com/?p=3431#comment-13739</guid>
		<description>True, Chris--I hope you&#039;re right about that.  Then again, the RT with a comment isn&#039;t just a copy, so . . . I&#039;m in &quot;let&#039;s see what it looks like in action&quot; mode.  How a thing is designed to be used and how people actually use it (lists being a case in point) don&#039;t always match.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True, Chris&#8211;I hope you&#39;re right about that.  Then again, the RT with a comment isn&#39;t just a copy, so . . . I&#39;m in &#8220;let&#39;s see what it looks like in action&#8221; mode.  How a thing is designed to be used and how people actually use it (lists being a case in point) don&#39;t always match.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Charabaruk</title>
		<link>http://staynalive.com/articles/screenshots-emerge-of-the-new-twitter-retweet-feature/comment-page-1/#comment-13738</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Charabaruk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 03:59:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://staynalive.com/?p=3431#comment-13738</guid>
		<description>The question of threaded replies, though... Will it be a FriendFeed model or a Blellow model? Will the replies be visible to all or just the person who posted the original tweet, or to the original poster and the retweeter?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;No matter how it&#039;s done, though, I don&#039;t see Twitter satisfying everyone. Unless Twitter starts pushing off people who continue to use the old way, which would probably turn into a PR disaster for them, I don&#039;t see the copy &amp; paste RT dying any time soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The question of threaded replies, though&#8230; Will it be a FriendFeed model or a Blellow model? Will the replies be visible to all or just the person who posted the original tweet, or to the original poster and the retweeter?</p>
<p>No matter how it&#39;s done, though, I don&#39;t see Twitter satisfying everyone. Unless Twitter starts pushing off people who continue to use the old way, which would probably turn into a PR disaster for them, I don&#39;t see the copy &#038; paste RT dying any time soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Charabaruk</title>
		<link>http://staynalive.com/articles/screenshots-emerge-of-the-new-twitter-retweet-feature/comment-page-1/#comment-13736</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Charabaruk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 03:56:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://staynalive.com/?p=3431#comment-13736</guid>
		<description>I think this will ease the &quot;echo chamber&quot;, since it merely brings up the retweeted post, rather than making a duplicate as the current, old method does</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this will ease the &#8220;echo chamber&#8221;, since it merely brings up the retweeted post, rather than making a duplicate as the current, old method does</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: axisportals</title>
		<link>http://staynalive.com/articles/screenshots-emerge-of-the-new-twitter-retweet-feature/comment-page-1/#comment-13733</link>
		<dc:creator>axisportals</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 03:45:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://staynalive.com/?p=3431#comment-13733</guid>
		<description>The threaded replies really would bring twitter in closer proximity to the FF experience, but I do wonder how listing out the RTs will impact the Twitter economy.  I tend not to like the echo chamber that endless RTing creates.  Will this ease that or make it worse? With lists already in place, do we really need to RT?  Why, for instance, *ever* RT Mashable or Scoble?  Stick them in a list, run the list feed to a widget, all done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The threaded replies really would bring twitter in closer proximity to the FF experience, but I do wonder how listing out the RTs will impact the Twitter economy.  I tend not to like the echo chamber that endless RTing creates.  Will this ease that or make it worse? With lists already in place, do we really need to RT?  Why, for instance, *ever* RT Mashable or Scoble?  Stick them in a list, run the list feed to a widget, all done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
