<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: London Earthquake and Twitter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://staynalive.com/articles/2008/02/27/london-earthquake-and-twitter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://staynalive.com/articles/2008/02/27/london-earthquake-and-twitter/</link>
	<description>My View of the Real-Time Web - Tech and Rants From Jesse Stay, The "Social" Geek</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 03:35:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: 2008 - The Year My Life Exploded &#124; Stay N' Alive</title>
		<link>http://staynalive.com/articles/2008/02/27/london-earthquake-and-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-10874</link>
		<dc:creator>2008 - The Year My Life Exploded &#124; Stay N' Alive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 06:26:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://staynalive.com/articles/2008/02/27/london-earthquake-and-twitter/#comment-10874</guid>
		<description>[...] which quickly fizzled as I ran out of time.  London had a small, but rare earthquake, and I saw it first on Twitter, on my cell phone, via track. In February I published my first [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] which quickly fizzled as I ran out of time.  London had a small, but rare earthquake, and I saw it first on Twitter, on my cell phone, via track. In February I published my first [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 5 Inspiring Uses for Twitter That Changed the World &#124; Stay N' Alive</title>
		<link>http://staynalive.com/articles/2008/02/27/london-earthquake-and-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-957</link>
		<dc:creator>5 Inspiring Uses for Twitter That Changed the World &#124; Stay N' Alive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 07:27:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://staynalive.com/articles/2008/02/27/london-earthquake-and-twitter/#comment-957</guid>
		<description>[...] may not seem like much, but a month or so ago, I received an update for this tracked item from a user saying something to the effect of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] may not seem like much, but a month or so ago, I received an update for this tracked item from a user saying something to the effect of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Stay</title>
		<link>http://staynalive.com/articles/2008/02/27/london-earthquake-and-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-768</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Stay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 05:37:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://staynalive.com/articles/2008/02/27/london-earthquake-and-twitter/#comment-768</guid>
		<description>Mike, while I agree with you that they are mostly interested in ratings (I used to work for a media company!), in both cases I list above, reporters *were* on the scene!  Traditional old media is clueless when it comes to technologies such as this.

On another note, @newmediajim, a cameraman from NBC News twitters regularly about the places he visits and the news he&#039;s covering.  Because of that, I generally try to watch the news that he&#039;s twittering about.  I think if reporters were to get on Twitter, report straight from Twitter, and encourage those following them to watch the details on the news later, News organizations could actually see their ratings *improve*!  Twitter is an excellent medium to get people excited, in 140 chars or less about an upcoming media broadcast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike, while I agree with you that they are mostly interested in ratings (I used to work for a media company!), in both cases I list above, reporters *were* on the scene!  Traditional old media is clueless when it comes to technologies such as this.</p>
<p>On another note, @newmediajim, a cameraman from NBC News twitters regularly about the places he visits and the news he&#8217;s covering.  Because of that, I generally try to watch the news that he&#8217;s twittering about.  I think if reporters were to get on Twitter, report straight from Twitter, and encourage those following them to watch the details on the news later, News organizations could actually see their ratings *improve*!  Twitter is an excellent medium to get people excited, in 140 chars or less about an upcoming media broadcast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Stay</title>
		<link>http://staynalive.com/articles/2008/02/27/london-earthquake-and-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-10261</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Stay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 05:37:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://staynalive.com/articles/2008/02/27/london-earthquake-and-twitter/#comment-10261</guid>
		<description>Mike, while I agree with you that they are mostly interested in ratings (I used to work for a media company!), in both cases I list above, reporters *were* on the scene!  Traditional old media is clueless when it comes to technologies such as this.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On another note, @newmediajim, a cameraman from NBC News twitters regularly about the places he visits and the news he&#039;s covering.  Because of that, I generally try to watch the news that he&#039;s twittering about.  I think if reporters were to get on Twitter, report straight from Twitter, and encourage those following them to watch the details on the news later, News organizations could actually see their ratings *improve*!  Twitter is an excellent medium to get people excited, in 140 chars or less about an upcoming media broadcast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike, while I agree with you that they are mostly interested in ratings (I used to work for a media company!), in both cases I list above, reporters *were* on the scene!  Traditional old media is clueless when it comes to technologies such as this.</p>
<p>On another note, @newmediajim, a cameraman from NBC News twitters regularly about the places he visits and the news he&#39;s covering.  Because of that, I generally try to watch the news that he&#39;s twittering about.  I think if reporters were to get on Twitter, report straight from Twitter, and encourage those following them to watch the details on the news later, News organizations could actually see their ratings *improve*!  Twitter is an excellent medium to get people excited, in 140 chars or less about an upcoming media broadcast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://staynalive.com/articles/2008/02/27/london-earthquake-and-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-759</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://staynalive.com/articles/2008/02/27/london-earthquake-and-twitter/#comment-759</guid>
		<description>Jesse, if the news had a reporter on the scene, they could have kept us updated us on TV! They have no interest in helping people stay informed, only in their ratings, which they believe are increased by their &quot;Tune in later for more news&quot; teasers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jesse, if the news had a reporter on the scene, they could have kept us updated us on TV! They have no interest in helping people stay informed, only in their ratings, which they believe are increased by their &#8220;Tune in later for more news&#8221; teasers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://staynalive.com/articles/2008/02/27/london-earthquake-and-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-5519</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://staynalive.com/articles/2008/02/27/london-earthquake-and-twitter/#comment-5519</guid>
		<description>Jesse, if the news had a reporter on the scene, they could have kept us updated us on TV! They have no interest in helping people stay informed, only in their ratings, which they believe are increased by their &quot;Tune in later for more news&quot; teasers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jesse, if the news had a reporter on the scene, they could have kept us updated us on TV! They have no interest in helping people stay informed, only in their ratings, which they believe are increased by their &#8220;Tune in later for more news&#8221; teasers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://staynalive.com/articles/2008/02/27/london-earthquake-and-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-6476</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://staynalive.com/articles/2008/02/27/london-earthquake-and-twitter/#comment-6476</guid>
		<description>Jesse, if the news had a reporter on the scene, they could have kept us updated us on TV! They have no interest in helping people stay informed, only in their ratings, which they believe are increased by their &quot;Tune in later for more news&quot; teasers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jesse, if the news had a reporter on the scene, they could have kept us updated us on TV! They have no interest in helping people stay informed, only in their ratings, which they believe are increased by their &#8220;Tune in later for more news&#8221; teasers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://staynalive.com/articles/2008/02/27/london-earthquake-and-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-7082</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://staynalive.com/articles/2008/02/27/london-earthquake-and-twitter/#comment-7082</guid>
		<description>Jesse, if the news had a reporter on the scene, they could have kept us updated us on TV! They have no interest in helping people stay informed, only in their ratings, which they believe are increased by their &quot;Tune in later for more news&quot; teasers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jesse, if the news had a reporter on the scene, they could have kept us updated us on TV! They have no interest in helping people stay informed, only in their ratings, which they believe are increased by their &#8220;Tune in later for more news&#8221; teasers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://staynalive.com/articles/2008/02/27/london-earthquake-and-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-9113</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://staynalive.com/articles/2008/02/27/london-earthquake-and-twitter/#comment-9113</guid>
		<description>Jesse, if the news had a reporter on the scene, they could have kept us updated us on TV! They have no interest in helping people stay informed, only in their ratings, which they believe are increased by their &quot;Tune in later for more news&quot; teasers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jesse, if the news had a reporter on the scene, they could have kept us updated us on TV! They have no interest in helping people stay informed, only in their ratings, which they believe are increased by their &#8220;Tune in later for more news&#8221; teasers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ontario Emperor</title>
		<link>http://staynalive.com/articles/2008/02/27/london-earthquake-and-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-756</link>
		<dc:creator>Ontario Emperor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 16:56:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://staynalive.com/articles/2008/02/27/london-earthquake-and-twitter/#comment-756</guid>
		<description>I first learned of the earthquake via tweets from &lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/rodrigomx&quot;&gt;@RodrigoMx&lt;/a&gt;, who was monitoring English coverage, and lack thereof, of the quake itself. Ironically, BBC was late in the game regarding its coverage, but when my local news radio station in the U.S. started broadcasting the story, they named the BBCas their source. Perhaps my local news radio station should monitor Twitter instead. 

P.S. @RodrigoMx is &lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/RodrigoMx/statuses/764046528&quot;&gt;currently reporting&lt;/a&gt; that William F. Buckley Jr. has died.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I first learned of the earthquake via tweets from <a href="http://twitter.com/rodrigomx" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/comment/twitter.com');">@RodrigoMx</a>, who was monitoring English coverage, and lack thereof, of the quake itself. Ironically, BBC was late in the game regarding its coverage, but when my local news radio station in the U.S. started broadcasting the story, they named the BBCas their source. Perhaps my local news radio station should monitor Twitter instead. </p>
<p>P.S. @RodrigoMx is <a href="http://twitter.com/RodrigoMx/statuses/764046528" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/comment/twitter.com');">currently reporting</a> that William F. Buckley Jr. has died.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
